Announcements

 View Only

Incorporating Crowd-Sourced Community Feedback Into Descriptive Metadata of Digitized Photographs: a new Visual Materials Description post in Descriptive Notes

  • 1.  Incorporating Crowd-Sourced Community Feedback Into Descriptive Metadata of Digitized Photographs: a new Visual Materials Description post in Descriptive Notes

    Posted 5 days ago

    Descriptive Notes is pleased to share a new post from Andrew Lippert about crowd-sourcing description of photographs by Jay Kay Klein, science fiction enthusiast whose collection is held by the Eaton Collection of Science Fiction and Fantasy at the University of California, Riverside. You can find the blogpost here: https://saadescription.wordpress.com/2026/02/17/incorporating-crowd-sourced-community-feedback-into-descriptive-metadata-of-digitized-photographs/

    In his post, Andrew describes the descriptive challenges of the collection and choice to welcome community feedback to more accurately describe digitized images made available on Calisphere, and the process of integrating the crowd-sourced metadata. He also describes the planned next steps for the project in his post, entitled "Incorporating Crowd-Sourced Community Feedback into Descriptive Metadata of Digitized Photographs."

    Descriptive Notes is soliciting submissions for an upcoming series on AI and archival description. Our hope is to provide space for conversation and multiple perspectives on the topic of AI and description. With this in mind, we are looking for folks to contribute 200-300 words on the development and/or implementation of AI policy in your institution for an upcoming piece in Descriptive Notes. Is your leadership developing an AI policy? Are you and your colleagues working on incorporating AI into existing policy? What challenges are you facing? What success stories do you have? Contributors to this piece can be anonymous/anonymized if requested. 

    We also welcome case studies, editorial or perspective pieces, situated around questions such as: Are you using AI as a tool for archival description? If so, what specific work are you attempting/accomplishing with it? What have you found to be the benefits and challenges? If you've chosen not to use AI in your descriptive practice, what factors or concerns have influenced that decision, and what challenges or pressures are you encountering as a result? Descriptive Notes is looking for articles, case studies, and other posts related to the how, what, and why (or why not) of AI and description to share with our readership. Posts may consider themes such as: the descriptive workflows or projects into which you've integrated generative AI, the challenges of implementing AI, guidelines or guardrails for using generative AI in description, how you've advocated for (or against) the use of AI in your descriptive practice … and more!

    Submit your pitches or interest in contributing to the policy post to saadescription@gmail.com.

    You can read more on our submission guidelines here: https://saadescription.wordpress.com/guidelines/We are also still interested in receiving submissions for any of our existing series, as well as any announcements or updates, conference dispatches, history and heritage month-related posts, as well as our longtime favorite finding aids pieces.

    Best,

    Betts Coup

    Blog Editor, Descriptive Notes



    ------------------------------
    Betts Coup
    Head of Archival Operations
    Technical Services for Archives & Special Collections
    Harvard University
    Cambridge, MA
    ------------------------------